Estimated reading time (in minutes)

Anonymity of detainees In a judgment of July 13, 2012, the Administrative Court of Paris ruled that the prison administration cannot unreasonably prohibit detainees from appearing with their faces uncovered in television reports, unless there is valid justification. This decision follows a complaint lodged by Candela Production, a production company, and Catherine Rechard, the director of the film “Le Déménagement”, which depicted the transfer of people from the Jacques Cartier remand center in Rennes to the new Rennes – Penitentiary center of Vezin. The applicants seek the annulment of three decisions of the Keeper of the Seals obliging them to ensure the physical and family anonymity of the detainees appearing in the film, despite the detainees’ written consent to be  identified  .

Uncovered Faces Ban: Challenging Prison Service Restrictions:-

The Paris Administrative Court concluded that the mere intention to broadcast the documentary on television did not, in itself, legally justify the contested decision. The court said there was no specific evidence to suggest that the release of the film would harm public order, prevent offences, protect the rights of victims or third parties or hinder the rehabilitation of those involved.

This judgment underlined the importance of reconciling the rights and interests of detainees with considerations of public order and security. Although the prison administration has a legitimate interest in protecting the anonymity and privacy of prisoners, it cannot impose general restrictions on their appearance in television reports without proper justification.

Balancing rights and justifications: Public order and privacy considerations: –

The court’s decision underscores the need for a case-by-case assessment of the potential impact of broadcasting such documentaries. It stresses that restrictions on the appearance of detainees must be based on specific circumstances and on a proven risk to public order or the rights of the persons concerned. The decision helps ensure transparency and freedom of expression in documenting and reporting on issues related to the criminal justice system.

Overall, this judgment clarifies the limits of the power of the prison administration to restrict the visibility of prisoners in television reports and underlines the importance of individual consent and the absence of specific justifications for such  restrictions  .

DAMY Law Firm