Estimated reading time (in minutes)

Consideration of the harshness of sentences The question of knowing whether justice must be even harsher to prevent recidivism is a complex and controversial question. While increasing the severity of the sentence may seem like a logical solution, it is important to consider the underlying factors that contribute to recidivism and the potential unintended consequences of harsher measures.

The argument for increased severity:-

There is no doubt that recidivism poses a significant challenge to society. Measures aimed at preventing recidivism have in fact multiplied over the years. These include improved supervision and monitoring, rehabilitation programs and community support services. However, some argue that these measures have not been sufficient to reduce recidivism rates, leading to calls for tougher sentences as a deterrent.

Proponents of increased severity argue that harsher penalties would instill fear and discourage individuals from engaging in criminal behavior. They believe that the threat of serious consequences would deter potential repeat offenders, thereby protecting society. Further, they argue that a greater emphasis on punishment is necessary to ensure justice for victims and to maintain public confidence in the criminal justice system.

The limits of increased severity:-

However, it is crucial to consider the potential downsides of a tougher justice system. Research indicates that recidivism is often influenced by a complex interplay of factors such as socioeconomic status, education, mental health and substance abuse. Focusing solely on punishment may ignore the underlying causes of criminal behavior and fail to effectively address these core issues.

Moreover, excessively punitive measures can lead to a series of unintended consequences. Long prison sentences, for example, can contribute to overcrowding in correctional facilities, straining resources and increasing costs to taxpayers. Harsher sentences can also exacerbate problems reintegrating into society, as people who have served their sentence may find it difficult to find a job or reintegrate into their community, which increases the risk of recidivism.

Rather than relying solely on increased severity, a holistic approach is needed to effectively address recidivism. This includes a focus on prevention through early intervention programs, improving access to education and employment opportunities, and providing strong rehabilitation and support services during and after incarceration. By addressing the underlying causes of criminal behavior and promoting successful reintegration, society can work to reduce recidivism rates without compromising the principles of justice.

DAMY Law Firm