[et_pb_section fb_built=”1″ admin_label=”section” _builder_version=”4.16″ global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_row column_structure=”1_3,1_3,1_3″ _builder_version=”4.19.5″ _module_preset=”default” background_enable_mask_style=”on” background_mask_style=”wave” background_mask_color=”rgba(0,0,0,0.08)” custom_padding=”||6px|||” locked=”off” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_column type=”1_3″ _builder_version=”4.19.5″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}”][\/et_pb_column][et_pb_column type=”1_3″ _builder_version=”4.19.5″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}”][\/et_pb_column][et_pb_column type=”1_3″ _builder_version=”4.19.5″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_circle_counter title=”Estimated reading time (in minutes)” number=”1″ percent_sign=”off” _builder_version=”4.19.5″ _module_preset=”default” title_font=”Amiri||||||||” max_width=”137px” global_colors_info=”{}”][\/et_pb_circle_counter][\/et_pb_column][\/et_pb_row][et_pb_row admin_label=”row” _builder_version=”4.16″ background_size=”initial” background_position=”top_left” background_repeat=”repeat” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_column type=”4_4″ _builder_version=”4.16″ custom_padding=”|||” global_colors_info=”{}” custom_padding__hover=”|||”][et_pb_divider _builder_version=”4.19.5″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}”][\/et_pb_divider][et_pb_image src=”https:\/\/gregorydamy.niceavocats.fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/justice-626461_1280-2.jpg” title_text=”justice-626461_1280-2″ _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” hover_enabled=”0″ global_colors_info=”{}” sticky_enabled=”0″][\/et_pb_image][et_pb_text admin_label=”Text” _builder_version=”4.21.0″ text_font=”Amiri||||||||” background_size=”initial” background_position=”top_left” background_repeat=”repeat” hover_enabled=”0″ global_colors_info=”{}” sticky_enabled=”0″]<\/p>\n
For the trial judges, the fact that the employer cannot legally dispense with employing a pharmacist full-time justified the retention of this employee in his position, even if his seniority was less.\u00a0Decision overturned by the Court of Cassation, which considers that the judge cannot rely on the status of\u00a0<\/span>part-time<\/span><\/a>\u00a0employee to decide that the latter must be dismissed in preference to a full-time employee.<\/span><\/p>\n Therefore, the status of part-time employee cannot constitute a deciding factor between employees in the event of redundancy.<\/span><\/p>\n Lawyer\u00a0<\/span>Gr\u00e9gory DAMY<\/span><\/a>\u00a0Nice labor law, dismissal;\u00a02022 UPDATE<\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n [\/et_pb_text][\/et_pb_column][\/et_pb_row][et_pb_row _builder_version=”4.19.5″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_column type=”4_4″ _builder_version=”4.19.5″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_divider _builder_version=”4.19.5″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}”][\/et_pb_divider][\/et_pb_column][\/et_pb_row][\/et_pb_section]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" The judge cannot rely on the status of part-time employee to decide that the latter must be dismissed in preference to a full-time employee.\u00a0An employee employed as a part-time pharmacist was dismissed for economic reasons, while the pharmacy also employed a full-time pharmacist but with less seniority. For the trial judges, the fact that the […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_et_pb_use_builder":"on","_et_pb_old_content":" by\u00a0<\/span>admin<\/span><\/a><\/span>\u00a0|\u00a0<\/span>Aug 13, 2012<\/span><\/span>\u00a0|\u00a0<\/span>News in labor law<\/span><\/a>\u00a0|\u00a0<\/span>0 comments<\/span><\/a><\/span><\/p>\r\n\r\n<\/div>\r\n\r\n<\/h1>\r\n
\r\nThe judge cannot rely on the status of part-time employee to decide that the latter should be dismissed in preference to a full-time employee.\u00a0An employee employed as a part-time pharmacist was dismissed for economic reasons, while the pharmacy also employed a full-time pharmacist, but with less seniority.<\/span><\/h1>\r\n
For the trial judges, the fact that the employer cannot legally dispense with employing a full-time pharmacist justified keeping this employee in office, even if his seniority was less.\u00a0Decision censured by the Court of Cassation, which considers that the judge cannot rely on the status of part-time employee to decide that the latter should be dismissed in preference to a full-time employee.<\/span><\/h2>\r\n
Therefore, the status of part-time employee cannot constitute a criterion for deciding between employees in the event of redundancy.<\/span><\/h3>\r\n
Lawyer Gr\u00e9gory DAMY Nice labor law, dismissal;\u00a02022 UPDATE<\/span><\/h4>\r\n<\/span>\r\n\r\n<\/div>","_et_gb_content_width":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[308],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3613","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-labour-law"],"yoast_head":"\n