{"id":3311,"date":"2012-08-07T14:52:47","date_gmt":"2012-08-07T14:52:47","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/gregorydamy.niceavocats.fr\/?p=3311"},"modified":"2023-08-24T06:15:31","modified_gmt":"2023-08-24T06:15:31","slug":"divorce-ruling","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/gregorydamy.niceavocats.fr\/en\/divorce-ruling\/","title":{"rendered":"Divorce with exclusive wrongs for prepotence and non-contribution to household expenses"},"content":{"rendered":"

[et_pb_section fb_built=”1″ admin_label=”section” _builder_version=”4.19.5″ custom_margin=”||0px||false|false” custom_padding=”||0px||false|false” locked=”off” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_row column_structure=”1_3,1_3,1_3″ _builder_version=”4.19.5″ _module_preset=”default” background_enable_mask_style=”on” background_mask_style=”wave” background_mask_color=”rgba(0,0,0,0.08)” custom_padding=”||6px|||” locked=”off” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_column type=”1_3″ _builder_version=”4.19.5″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}”][\/et_pb_column][et_pb_column type=”1_3″ _builder_version=”4.19.5″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}”][\/et_pb_column][et_pb_column type=”1_3″ _builder_version=”4.19.5″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_circle_counter title=”Estimated reading time (in minutes)” number=”2″ percent_sign=”off” _builder_version=”4.19.5″ _module_preset=”default” title_font=”Amiri||||||||” max_width=”137px” global_colors_info=”{}”][\/et_pb_circle_counter][\/et_pb_column][\/et_pb_row][et_pb_row _builder_version=”4.19.5″ _module_preset=”default” custom_margin=”||0px||false|false” custom_padding=”||0px||false|false” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_column type=”4_4″ _builder_version=”4.19.5″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_divider _builder_version=”4.19.5″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}”][\/et_pb_divider][\/et_pb_column][\/et_pb_row][et_pb_row admin_label=”row” _builder_version=”4.16″ background_size=”initial” background_position=”top_left” background_repeat=”repeat” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_column type=”4_4″ _builder_version=”4.16″ custom_padding=”|||” global_colors_info=”{}” custom_padding__hover=”|||”][et_pb_image src=”https:\/\/gregorydamy.niceavocats.fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/breakup-908714_1280-2.jpg” title_text=”breakup-908714_1280-2″ _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” hover_enabled=”0″ global_colors_info=”{}” sticky_enabled=”0″][\/et_pb_image][et_pb_text admin_label=”Text” _builder_version=”4.21.0″ text_font=”Amiri||||||||” header_2_font=”Amiri||||||||” header_3_font=”Amiri||||||||” background_size=”initial” background_position=”top_left” background_repeat=”repeat” hover_enabled=”0″ global_colors_info=”{}” sticky_enabled=”0″]<\/p>\n

\n

In a judgment of\u00a0<\/span>July 4, 2012<\/span><\/a>, the first civil chamber of the Court of Cassation dismissed the appeal: “given that it is in the exercise of its sovereign power that the Court of Appeal has, in view of all the documents adduced in the proceedings and without distortion of these, on the one hand, considered that the sole source of the couple’s income, he had not contributed in proportion to his income to household expenses and maintenance of the marital home and had shown prepotence in family life and deduced therefrom that these facts constituted a serious and renewed violation of the duties and obligations of marriage justifying the pronouncement of the divorce to his exclusive faults, on the other hand,found that the breakdown of the marriage created in the living conditions of the spouses a disparity whose compensation called for the allocation to his spouse of the compensatory allowance which the latter set the amount;<\/span><\/p>\n

that these reasons, which escape the grievances of the means, legally justify its decision.\u00a0\u00bb<\/span><\/p>\n

In this case, the compensatory allowance is 200,000 euros.<\/span><\/p>\n

Gr\u00e9gory DAMY<\/span><\/a>\u00a0lawyer nice 2020<\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n<\/div>\n

[\/et_pb_text][\/et_pb_column][\/et_pb_row][et_pb_row _builder_version=”4.19.5″ _module_preset=”default” custom_margin=”||0px||false|false” custom_padding=”||0px||false|false” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_column type=”4_4″ _builder_version=”4.19.5″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_divider _builder_version=”4.19.5″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}”][\/et_pb_divider][\/et_pb_column][\/et_pb_row][\/et_pb_section]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

In a judgment of\u00a0July 4, 2012, the first civil chamber of the Court of Cassation dismissed the appeal: “given that it is in the exercise of its sovereign power that the Court of Appeal has, in view of all the documents adduced in the proceedings and without distortion of these, on the one hand, considered […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_et_pb_use_builder":"on","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[303],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3311","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-family-law"],"yoast_head":"\nDivorce with exclusive wrongs for prepotence and non-contribution to household expenses - Soci\u00e9t\u00e9 d'avocats Damy<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Divorce with exclusive wrongs for prepotence and non-contribution to household expenses In a judgment of July 4, 2012,\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/gregorydamy.niceavocats.fr\/en\/divorce-ruling\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Divorce with exclusive wrongs for prepotence and non-contribution to household expenses - Soci\u00e9t\u00e9 d'avocats Damy\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Divorce with exclusive wrongs for prepotence and non-contribution to household expenses In a judgment of July 4, 2012,\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/gregorydamy.niceavocats.fr\/en\/divorce-ruling\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Soci\u00e9t\u00e9 d'avocats Damy\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/niceavocats.fr\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2012-08-07T14:52:47+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2023-08-24T06:15:31+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Kevin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Kevin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/gregorydamy.niceavocats.fr\/en\/divorce-ruling\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/gregorydamy.niceavocats.fr\/en\/divorce-ruling\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Kevin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/gregorydamy.niceavocats.fr\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/e040acb2856efaa1e114d0e7a92a3870\"},\"headline\":\"Divorce with exclusive wrongs for prepotence and non-contribution to household expenses\",\"datePublished\":\"2012-08-07T14:52:47+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-08-24T06:15:31+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/gregorydamy.niceavocats.fr\/en\/divorce-ruling\/\"},\"wordCount\":551,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/gregorydamy.niceavocats.fr\/en\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Family law\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/gregorydamy.niceavocats.fr\/en\/divorce-ruling\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/gregorydamy.niceavocats.fr\/en\/divorce-ruling\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/gregorydamy.niceavocats.fr\/en\/divorce-ruling\/\",\"name\":\"Divorce with exclusive wrongs for prepotence and non-contribution to household expenses - Soci\u00e9t\u00e9 d'avocats Damy\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/gregorydamy.niceavocats.fr\/en\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2012-08-07T14:52:47+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-08-24T06:15:31+00:00\",\"description\":\"Divorce with exclusive wrongs for prepotence and non-contribution to household expenses In a judgment of July 4, 2012,\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/gregorydamy.niceavocats.fr\/en\/divorce-ruling\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/gregorydamy.niceavocats.fr\/en\/divorce-ruling\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/gregorydamy.niceavocats.fr\/en\/divorce-ruling\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Accueil\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/gregorydamy.niceavocats.fr\/en\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Divorce with exclusive wrongs for prepotence and non-contribution to household expenses\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/gregorydamy.niceavocats.fr\/en\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/gregorydamy.niceavocats.fr\/en\/\",\"name\":\"Soci\u00e9t\u00e9 d'avocats Damy\",\"description\":\"Justice - Confiance - Efficacit\u00e9\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/gregorydamy.niceavocats.fr\/en\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/gregorydamy.niceavocats.fr\/en\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/gregorydamy.niceavocats.fr\/en\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Soci\u00e9t\u00e9 d'Avocats DAMY\",\"alternateName\":\"Gr\u00e9gory DAMY\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/gregorydamy.niceavocats.fr\/en\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/gregorydamy.niceavocats.fr\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/gregorydamy.niceavocats.fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/damylogo-1.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/gregorydamy.niceavocats.fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/damylogo-1.png\",\"width\":1890,\"height\":1417,\"caption\":\"Soci\u00e9t\u00e9 d'Avocats DAMY\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/gregorydamy.niceavocats.fr\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/niceavocats.fr\/\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/gregorydamy.niceavocats.fr\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/e040acb2856efaa1e114d0e7a92a3870\",\"name\":\"Kevin\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/gregorydamy.niceavocats.fr\/en\/author\/kevin\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Divorce with exclusive wrongs for prepotence and non-contribution to household expenses - Soci\u00e9t\u00e9 d'avocats Damy","description":"Divorce with exclusive wrongs for prepotence and non-contribution to household expenses In a judgment of July 4, 2012,","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/gregorydamy.niceavocats.fr\/en\/divorce-ruling\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Divorce with exclusive wrongs for prepotence and non-contribution to household expenses - Soci\u00e9t\u00e9 d'avocats Damy","og_description":"Divorce with exclusive wrongs for prepotence and non-contribution to household expenses In a judgment of July 4, 2012,","og_url":"https:\/\/gregorydamy.niceavocats.fr\/en\/divorce-ruling\/","og_site_name":"Soci\u00e9t\u00e9 d'avocats Damy","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/niceavocats.fr\/","article_published_time":"2012-08-07T14:52:47+00:00","article_modified_time":"2023-08-24T06:15:31+00:00","author":"Kevin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Kevin","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/gregorydamy.niceavocats.fr\/en\/divorce-ruling\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/gregorydamy.niceavocats.fr\/en\/divorce-ruling\/"},"author":{"name":"Kevin","@id":"https:\/\/gregorydamy.niceavocats.fr\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/e040acb2856efaa1e114d0e7a92a3870"},"headline":"Divorce with exclusive wrongs for prepotence and non-contribution to household expenses","datePublished":"2012-08-07T14:52:47+00:00","dateModified":"2023-08-24T06:15:31+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/gregorydamy.niceavocats.fr\/en\/divorce-ruling\/"},"wordCount":551,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/gregorydamy.niceavocats.fr\/en\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Family law"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/gregorydamy.niceavocats.fr\/en\/divorce-ruling\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/gregorydamy.niceavocats.fr\/en\/divorce-ruling\/","url":"https:\/\/gregorydamy.niceavocats.fr\/en\/divorce-ruling\/","name":"Divorce with exclusive wrongs for prepotence and non-contribution to household expenses - Soci\u00e9t\u00e9 d'avocats Damy","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/gregorydamy.niceavocats.fr\/en\/#website"},"datePublished":"2012-08-07T14:52:47+00:00","dateModified":"2023-08-24T06:15:31+00:00","description":"Divorce with exclusive wrongs for prepotence and non-contribution to household expenses In a judgment of July 4, 2012,","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/gregorydamy.niceavocats.fr\/en\/divorce-ruling\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/gregorydamy.niceavocats.fr\/en\/divorce-ruling\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/gregorydamy.niceavocats.fr\/en\/divorce-ruling\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Accueil","item":"https:\/\/gregorydamy.niceavocats.fr\/en\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Divorce with exclusive wrongs for prepotence and non-contribution to household expenses"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/gregorydamy.niceavocats.fr\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/gregorydamy.niceavocats.fr\/en\/","name":"Soci\u00e9t\u00e9 d'avocats Damy","description":"Justice - Confiance - Efficacit\u00e9","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/gregorydamy.niceavocats.fr\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/gregorydamy.niceavocats.fr\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/gregorydamy.niceavocats.fr\/en\/#organization","name":"Soci\u00e9t\u00e9 d'Avocats DAMY","alternateName":"Gr\u00e9gory DAMY","url":"https:\/\/gregorydamy.niceavocats.fr\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/gregorydamy.niceavocats.fr\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/gregorydamy.niceavocats.fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/damylogo-1.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/gregorydamy.niceavocats.fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/damylogo-1.png","width":1890,"height":1417,"caption":"Soci\u00e9t\u00e9 d'Avocats DAMY"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/gregorydamy.niceavocats.fr\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/niceavocats.fr\/"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/gregorydamy.niceavocats.fr\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/e040acb2856efaa1e114d0e7a92a3870","name":"Kevin","url":"https:\/\/gregorydamy.niceavocats.fr\/en\/author\/kevin\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/gregorydamy.niceavocats.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3311","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/gregorydamy.niceavocats.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/gregorydamy.niceavocats.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gregorydamy.niceavocats.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gregorydamy.niceavocats.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3311"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/gregorydamy.niceavocats.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3311\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/gregorydamy.niceavocats.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3311"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gregorydamy.niceavocats.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3311"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gregorydamy.niceavocats.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3311"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}