{"id":2393,"date":"2013-07-31T10:31:29","date_gmt":"2013-07-31T10:31:29","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/gregorydamy.niceavocats.fr\/?p=2393"},"modified":"2023-08-29T11:38:28","modified_gmt":"2023-08-29T11:38:28","slug":"respect-for-safety-at-work","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/gregorydamy.niceavocats.fr\/en\/respect-for-safety-at-work\/","title":{"rendered":"Respect for safety at work"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>[et_pb_section fb_built=&#8221;1&#8243; admin_label=&#8221;section&#8221; _builder_version=&#8221;4.19.5&#8243; custom_margin=&#8221;||0px||false|false&#8221; custom_padding=&#8221;||0px||false|false&#8221; locked=&#8221;off&#8221; global_colors_info=&#8221;{}&#8221;][et_pb_row column_structure=&#8221;1_3,1_3,1_3&#8243; _builder_version=&#8221;4.19.5&#8243; _module_preset=&#8221;default&#8221; background_enable_mask_style=&#8221;on&#8221; background_mask_style=&#8221;wave&#8221; background_mask_color=&#8221;rgba(0,0,0,0.08)&#8221; custom_padding=&#8221;||6px|||&#8221; locked=&#8221;off&#8221; global_colors_info=&#8221;{}&#8221;][et_pb_column type=&#8221;1_3&#8243; _builder_version=&#8221;4.19.5&#8243; _module_preset=&#8221;default&#8221; global_colors_info=&#8221;{}&#8221;][\/et_pb_column][et_pb_column type=&#8221;1_3&#8243; _builder_version=&#8221;4.19.5&#8243; _module_preset=&#8221;default&#8221; global_colors_info=&#8221;{}&#8221;][\/et_pb_column][et_pb_column type=&#8221;1_3&#8243; _builder_version=&#8221;4.19.5&#8243; _module_preset=&#8221;default&#8221; global_colors_info=&#8221;{}&#8221;][et_pb_circle_counter title=&#8221;Estimated reading time (in minutes)&#8221; number=&#8221;2&#8243; percent_sign=&#8221;off&#8221; _builder_version=&#8221;4.19.5&#8243; _module_preset=&#8221;default&#8221; title_font=&#8221;Amiri||||||||&#8221; max_width=&#8221;137px&#8221; global_colors_info=&#8221;{}&#8221;][\/et_pb_circle_counter][\/et_pb_column][\/et_pb_row][et_pb_row _builder_version=&#8221;4.19.5&#8243; _module_preset=&#8221;default&#8221; custom_margin=&#8221;||0px||false|false&#8221; custom_padding=&#8221;||0px||false|false&#8221; global_colors_info=&#8221;{}&#8221;][et_pb_column type=&#8221;4_4&#8243; _builder_version=&#8221;4.19.5&#8243; _module_preset=&#8221;default&#8221; global_colors_info=&#8221;{}&#8221;][et_pb_divider _builder_version=&#8221;4.19.5&#8243; _module_preset=&#8221;default&#8221; global_colors_info=&#8221;{}&#8221;][\/et_pb_divider][\/et_pb_column][\/et_pb_row][et_pb_row admin_label=&#8221;row&#8221; _builder_version=&#8221;4.16&#8243; background_size=&#8221;initial&#8221; background_position=&#8221;top_left&#8221; background_repeat=&#8221;repeat&#8221; global_colors_info=&#8221;{}&#8221;][et_pb_column type=&#8221;4_4&#8243; _builder_version=&#8221;4.16&#8243; custom_padding=&#8221;|||&#8221; global_colors_info=&#8221;{}&#8221; custom_padding__hover=&#8221;|||&#8221;][et_pb_image src=&#8221;https:\/\/gregorydamy.niceavocats.fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/construction-worker-569126_1280-2.jpg&#8221; title_text=&#8221;construction-worker-569126_1280-2&#8243; align=&#8221;center&#8221; _builder_version=&#8221;4.21.0&#8243; _module_preset=&#8221;default&#8221; hover_enabled=&#8221;0&#8243; global_colors_info=&#8221;{}&#8221; sticky_enabled=&#8221;0&#8243;][\/et_pb_image][et_pb_text admin_label=&#8221;Text&#8221; _builder_version=&#8221;4.21.0&#8243; text_font=&#8221;Amiri||||||||&#8221; header_2_font=&#8221;Amiri||||||||&#8221; header_3_font=&#8221;Amiri||||||||&#8221; background_size=&#8221;initial&#8221; background_position=&#8221;top_left&#8221; background_repeat=&#8221;repeat&#8221; hover_enabled=&#8221;0&#8243; global_colors_info=&#8221;{}&#8221; sticky_enabled=&#8221;0&#8243;]<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"\"><span>Respect for safety The\u00a0<\/span><\/span><span class=\"\"><span>\u00a0Court of Cassation, in its judgment of June 19, 2013, established that the repeated refusal of an employee to wear personal protective equipment (PPE) constitutes serious misconduct making it impossible for them to remain in the\u00a0\u00a0<\/span><\/span><span class=\"\"><span>company\u00a0<\/span><\/span><span class=\"\"><span>\u00a0.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<h2><span>Employee&#8217;s refusal to wear personal protective equipment as gross misconduct:-<\/span><\/h2>\n<p><span>The case involved a warehouse manager who was terminated for gross misconduct due to her persistent and intentional refusal to comply with safety instructions\u00a0<\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.service-public.fr\/particuliers\/vosdroits\/F2210\"><span>by<\/span><\/a><span>\u00a0not wearing required safety equipment, including shoes, gloves, cap and safety vest.\u00a0The employee contested the dismissal.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span>According to the Court of Cassation, the behavior of the employee, taking into account in particular her role as manager responsible for setting an example for the members of her team, constituted serious misconduct justifying her dismissal.\u00a0As part of her job, it was crucial for the employee to follow safety protocols and keep herself and others safe in the workplace.<\/span><\/p>\n<h2><span>Employer Obligation for Employee Safety and Employee Responsibilities:-<\/span><\/h2>\n<p><span>The decision underlines the employer&#8217;s obligation to ensure the safety and well-being of its employees.\u00a0Employers are legally obliged to take all necessary measures to provide a safe working environment and to protect the physical and mental health of their staff.\u00a0On the other hand, employees are required to follow the instructions and guidelines provided by their employer regarding occupational health and safety.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span>It is essential that both parties fulfill their respective responsibilities to maintain a safe working environment.\u00a0Employers should prioritize the safety of their employees, while employees should follow safety protocols and use the necessary protective equipment to minimize risk.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span>Overall, the judgment of the Court of Cassation affirms that the persistent refusal of an employee to wear personal protective equipment constitutes serious misconduct, justifying his dismissal.\u00a0This decision serves to emphasize the importance of workplace safety and the obligations of employers and employees to ensure a\u00a0\u00a0<\/span><span>\u00a0safe working\u00a0\u00a0<\/span><span>environment .<\/span><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.service-public.fr\/particuliers\/vosdroits\/F2210\"><span>DAMY Law Firm<\/span><\/a><span>\u00a02021 \u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p>[\/et_pb_text][\/et_pb_column][\/et_pb_row][et_pb_row _builder_version=&#8221;4.19.5&#8243; _module_preset=&#8221;default&#8221; custom_margin=&#8221;||0px||false|false&#8221; custom_padding=&#8221;||0px||false|false&#8221; global_colors_info=&#8221;{}&#8221;][et_pb_column type=&#8221;4_4&#8243; _builder_version=&#8221;4.19.5&#8243; _module_preset=&#8221;default&#8221; global_colors_info=&#8221;{}&#8221;][et_pb_divider _builder_version=&#8221;4.19.5&#8243; _module_preset=&#8221;default&#8221; global_colors_info=&#8221;{}&#8221;][\/et_pb_divider][\/et_pb_column][\/et_pb_row][\/et_pb_section]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Respect for safety The\u00a0\u00a0Court of Cassation, in its judgment of June 19, 2013, established that the repeated refusal of an employee to wear personal protective equipment (PPE) constitutes serious misconduct making it impossible for them to remain in the\u00a0\u00a0company\u00a0\u00a0. Employee&#8217;s refusal to wear personal protective equipment as gross misconduct:- The case involved a warehouse manager [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_et_pb_use_builder":"on","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[308],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2393","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-labour-law"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v26.8 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Respect for safety at work - Soci\u00e9t\u00e9 d&#039;avocats Damy<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Respect for safety at work the Court of Cassation, in its ruling on June 19, 2013, has established that an employee&#039;s repeated refusal to\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/gregorydamy.niceavocats.fr\/en\/respect-for-safety-at-work\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Respect for safety at work - Soci\u00e9t\u00e9 d&#039;avocats Damy\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Respect for safety at work the Court of Cassation, in its ruling on June 19, 2013, has established that an employee&#039;s repeated refusal to\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/gregorydamy.niceavocats.fr\/en\/respect-for-safety-at-work\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Soci\u00e9t\u00e9 d&#039;avocats Damy\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/niceavocats.fr\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2013-07-31T10:31:29+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2023-08-29T11:38:28+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Kevin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Kevin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/gregorydamy.niceavocats.fr\/en\/respect-for-safety-at-work\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/gregorydamy.niceavocats.fr\/en\/respect-for-safety-at-work\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Kevin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/gregorydamy.niceavocats.fr\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/e040acb2856efaa1e114d0e7a92a3870\"},\"headline\":\"Respect for safety at work\",\"datePublished\":\"2013-07-31T10:31:29+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-08-29T11:38:28+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/gregorydamy.niceavocats.fr\/en\/respect-for-safety-at-work\/\"},\"wordCount\":681,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/gregorydamy.niceavocats.fr\/en\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Labour law\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/gregorydamy.niceavocats.fr\/en\/respect-for-safety-at-work\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/gregorydamy.niceavocats.fr\/en\/respect-for-safety-at-work\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/gregorydamy.niceavocats.fr\/en\/respect-for-safety-at-work\/\",\"name\":\"Respect for safety at work - Soci\u00e9t\u00e9 d&#039;avocats Damy\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/gregorydamy.niceavocats.fr\/en\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2013-07-31T10:31:29+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-08-29T11:38:28+00:00\",\"description\":\"Respect for safety at work the Court of Cassation, in its ruling on June 19, 2013, has established that an employee's repeated refusal to\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/gregorydamy.niceavocats.fr\/en\/respect-for-safety-at-work\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/gregorydamy.niceavocats.fr\/en\/respect-for-safety-at-work\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/gregorydamy.niceavocats.fr\/en\/respect-for-safety-at-work\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Accueil\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/gregorydamy.niceavocats.fr\/en\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Respect for safety at work\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/gregorydamy.niceavocats.fr\/en\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/gregorydamy.niceavocats.fr\/en\/\",\"name\":\"Soci\u00e9t\u00e9 d&#039;avocats Damy\",\"description\":\"Justice - Confiance - Efficacit\u00e9\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/gregorydamy.niceavocats.fr\/en\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/gregorydamy.niceavocats.fr\/en\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/gregorydamy.niceavocats.fr\/en\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Soci\u00e9t\u00e9 d'Avocats DAMY\",\"alternateName\":\"Gr\u00e9gory DAMY\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/gregorydamy.niceavocats.fr\/en\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/gregorydamy.niceavocats.fr\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/gregorydamy.niceavocats.fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/damylogo-1.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/gregorydamy.niceavocats.fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/damylogo-1.png\",\"width\":1890,\"height\":1417,\"caption\":\"Soci\u00e9t\u00e9 d'Avocats DAMY\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/gregorydamy.niceavocats.fr\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/niceavocats.fr\/\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/gregorydamy.niceavocats.fr\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/e040acb2856efaa1e114d0e7a92a3870\",\"name\":\"Kevin\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/gregorydamy.niceavocats.fr\/en\/author\/kevin\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Respect for safety at work - Soci\u00e9t\u00e9 d&#039;avocats Damy","description":"Respect for safety at work the Court of Cassation, in its ruling on June 19, 2013, has established that an employee's repeated refusal to","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/gregorydamy.niceavocats.fr\/en\/respect-for-safety-at-work\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Respect for safety at work - Soci\u00e9t\u00e9 d&#039;avocats Damy","og_description":"Respect for safety at work the Court of Cassation, in its ruling on June 19, 2013, has established that an employee's repeated refusal to","og_url":"https:\/\/gregorydamy.niceavocats.fr\/en\/respect-for-safety-at-work\/","og_site_name":"Soci\u00e9t\u00e9 d&#039;avocats Damy","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/niceavocats.fr\/","article_published_time":"2013-07-31T10:31:29+00:00","article_modified_time":"2023-08-29T11:38:28+00:00","author":"Kevin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Kevin","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/gregorydamy.niceavocats.fr\/en\/respect-for-safety-at-work\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/gregorydamy.niceavocats.fr\/en\/respect-for-safety-at-work\/"},"author":{"name":"Kevin","@id":"https:\/\/gregorydamy.niceavocats.fr\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/e040acb2856efaa1e114d0e7a92a3870"},"headline":"Respect for safety at work","datePublished":"2013-07-31T10:31:29+00:00","dateModified":"2023-08-29T11:38:28+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/gregorydamy.niceavocats.fr\/en\/respect-for-safety-at-work\/"},"wordCount":681,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/gregorydamy.niceavocats.fr\/en\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Labour law"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/gregorydamy.niceavocats.fr\/en\/respect-for-safety-at-work\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/gregorydamy.niceavocats.fr\/en\/respect-for-safety-at-work\/","url":"https:\/\/gregorydamy.niceavocats.fr\/en\/respect-for-safety-at-work\/","name":"Respect for safety at work - Soci\u00e9t\u00e9 d&#039;avocats Damy","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/gregorydamy.niceavocats.fr\/en\/#website"},"datePublished":"2013-07-31T10:31:29+00:00","dateModified":"2023-08-29T11:38:28+00:00","description":"Respect for safety at work the Court of Cassation, in its ruling on June 19, 2013, has established that an employee's repeated refusal to","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/gregorydamy.niceavocats.fr\/en\/respect-for-safety-at-work\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/gregorydamy.niceavocats.fr\/en\/respect-for-safety-at-work\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/gregorydamy.niceavocats.fr\/en\/respect-for-safety-at-work\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Accueil","item":"https:\/\/gregorydamy.niceavocats.fr\/en\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Respect for safety at work"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/gregorydamy.niceavocats.fr\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/gregorydamy.niceavocats.fr\/en\/","name":"Soci\u00e9t\u00e9 d&#039;avocats Damy","description":"Justice - Confiance - Efficacit\u00e9","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/gregorydamy.niceavocats.fr\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/gregorydamy.niceavocats.fr\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/gregorydamy.niceavocats.fr\/en\/#organization","name":"Soci\u00e9t\u00e9 d'Avocats DAMY","alternateName":"Gr\u00e9gory DAMY","url":"https:\/\/gregorydamy.niceavocats.fr\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/gregorydamy.niceavocats.fr\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/gregorydamy.niceavocats.fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/damylogo-1.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/gregorydamy.niceavocats.fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/damylogo-1.png","width":1890,"height":1417,"caption":"Soci\u00e9t\u00e9 d'Avocats DAMY"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/gregorydamy.niceavocats.fr\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/niceavocats.fr\/"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/gregorydamy.niceavocats.fr\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/e040acb2856efaa1e114d0e7a92a3870","name":"Kevin","url":"https:\/\/gregorydamy.niceavocats.fr\/en\/author\/kevin\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/gregorydamy.niceavocats.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2393","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/gregorydamy.niceavocats.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/gregorydamy.niceavocats.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gregorydamy.niceavocats.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gregorydamy.niceavocats.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2393"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/gregorydamy.niceavocats.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2393\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/gregorydamy.niceavocats.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2393"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gregorydamy.niceavocats.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2393"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gregorydamy.niceavocats.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2393"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}