{"id":2001,"date":"2015-04-13T16:52:51","date_gmt":"2015-04-13T16:52:51","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/gregorydamy.niceavocats.fr\/?p=2001"},"modified":"2023-08-02T06:10:26","modified_gmt":"2023-08-02T06:10:26","slug":"eu-court-ruling","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/gregorydamy.niceavocats.fr\/en\/eu-court-ruling\/","title":{"rendered":"Opinion of the CJEU concerning the levy of the CSG and CRDS"},"content":{"rendered":"

[et_pb_section fb_built=”1″ admin_label=”section” _builder_version=”4.19.5″ custom_margin=”||0px||false|false” custom_padding=”||0px||false|false” locked=”off” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_row column_structure=”1_3,1_3,1_3″ _builder_version=”4.19.5″ _module_preset=”default” background_enable_mask_style=”on” background_mask_style=”wave” background_mask_color=”rgba(0,0,0,0.08)” custom_padding=”||6px|||” locked=”off” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_column type=”1_3″ _builder_version=”4.19.5″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}”][\/et_pb_column][et_pb_column type=”1_3″ _builder_version=”4.19.5″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}”][\/et_pb_column][et_pb_column type=”1_3″ _builder_version=”4.19.5″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_circle_counter title=” Estimated reading time (in minutes)” number=”1″ percent_sign=”off” _builder_version=”4.19.5″ _module_preset=”default” title_font=”Amiri||||||||” max_width=”137px” global_colors_info=”{}”][\/et_pb_circle_counter][\/et_pb_column][\/et_pb_row][et_pb_row _builder_version=”4.19.5″ _module_preset=”default” custom_margin=”||0px||false|false” custom_padding=”||0px||false|false” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_column type=”4_4″ _builder_version=”4.19.5″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_divider _builder_version=”4.19.5″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}”][\/et_pb_divider][\/et_pb_column][\/et_pb_row][et_pb_row admin_label=”row” _builder_version=”4.16″ background_size=”initial” background_position=”top_left” background_repeat=”repeat” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_column type=”4_4″ _builder_version=”4.16″ custom_padding=”|||” global_colors_info=”{}” custom_padding__hover=”|||”][et_pb_image src=”https:\/\/gregorydamy.niceavocats.fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/britain-eu-brexit-referendum-concept-scaled.jpg” title_text=”Britain EU Brexit Referendum Concept” _builder_version=”4.21.0″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}”][\/et_pb_image][et_pb_text admin_label=”Text” _builder_version=”4.21.0″ text_font=”Amiri||||||||” header_2_font=”Amiri||||||||” header_3_font=”Amiri||||||||” background_size=”initial” background_position=”top_left” background_repeat=”repeat” hover_enabled=”0″ global_colors_info=”{}” sticky_enabled=”0″]<\/p>\n

\n
\n
\n
\n

Judgment of the Court of Justice of the EU\u00a0<\/span>\u00a0The Court of Justice of the European Union ruled against France regarding the levy of the\u00a0<\/span>CSG and the CRDS<\/span><\/a>\u00a0on the income from the assets of non-resident, French and foreign taxpayers.\u00a0They can demand repayment within two years after payment of\u00a0\u00a0<\/span>\u00a0social security\u00a0<\/span>contributions .<\/span><\/p>\n

Real estate capital gain of foreigners: \u2013<\/span><\/h2>\n

France does not have the right to impose social security contributions on people who do not benefit from Social Security.\u00a0The Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) delivered a ruling to this effect on Thursday, February 26, 2015. The judicial authority ruled that France does not have the right to deduct the CSG and the CRDS from the income of non-resident taxpayers domiciled in France.\u00a0More specifically, the Court condemned France against a Dutch national working in the Netherlands but domiciled in France to whom it applied social security contributions on life annuities concluded in the Netherlands.<\/span>
According to European case law, a taxpayer does not have to pay social security contributions from several countries on this income.\u00a0In other words, he is liable to only one social security: concretely, a French cross-border worker working in Germany and whose income is already subject to social security contributions across the Rhine does not have to pay French social security contributions.\u00a0A prohibition which has been valid since 2000 for earned and replacement income (salaries, retirement pensions, allowances, etc.) and which now officially applies to income from assets (real estate income, interest from a life insurance contract \u2026).\u00a0).<\/span><\/p>\n

REIMBURSEMENT AND PRESCRIPTION:-<\/span><\/h2>\n

The conflict settled by the CJEU dates back to the summer of 2012. The first finance law of Fran\u00e7ois Hollande’s mandate introduced the application of social security contributions at 15.5% on the property income of non-residents as well as their capital gains real estate.\u00a0The measure has since been strongly contested, in particular by wealth management professionals or even Fr\u00e9d\u00e9ric Lefebvre, UMP deputy for French expatriates in North America.<\/span>
Following the judgment delivered by the Luxembourg court, taxpayers who have had to pay social security contributions since the entry into force of the measure can demand a refund.\u00a0<\/span><\/span>Please note, however, that a limitation period of two years applies to claims.\u00a0It runs from the date of payment of social security contributions.\u00a0Indeed, some taxpayers can no longer obtain compensation: it was thus necessary to submit a request for reimbursement before 31 December 2014 for capital gains on real estate realized in 2013. Conversely, social contributions on income land collected in 2012 and taxed in 2013 can still be reimbursed.\u00a0In this case, the request must be sent before December 31, 2015.<\/span><\/span>
Our firm will assist you in the event of a claim in order to guarantee your\u00a0\u00a0<\/span><\/span>reimbursement\u00a0<\/span><\/span>\u00a0.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

DAMY Law Firm<\/span><\/a>\u00a0.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\u00a0<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

[\/et_pb_text][\/et_pb_column][\/et_pb_row][et_pb_row _builder_version=”4.19.5″ _module_preset=”default” custom_margin=”||0px||false|false” custom_padding=”||0px||false|false” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_column type=”4_4″ _builder_version=”4.19.5″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_divider _builder_version=”4.19.5″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}”][\/et_pb_divider][\/et_pb_column][\/et_pb_row][\/et_pb_section]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Judgment of the Court of Justice of the EU\u00a0\u00a0The Court of Justice of the European Union ruled against France regarding the levy of the\u00a0CSG and the CRDS\u00a0on the income from the assets of non-resident, French and foreign taxpayers.\u00a0They can demand repayment within two years after payment of\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0social security\u00a0contributions . Real estate capital gain of foreigners: […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_et_pb_use_builder":"on","_et_pb_old_content":"The Court of Justice of the European Union has ruled against France concerning the levy of the CSG and the CRDS on the income from the assets of non-resident taxpayers, French and foreign. They can demand reimbursement within two years after payment of social security contributions.\r\nFrance does not have the right to charge social security contributions to people who do not benefit from Social Security. The Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) rendered a judgment to this effect on Thursday 26 February 2015. The judicial authority ruled that France does not have the right to deduct the CSG and the CRDS from the income of non-resident taxpayers domiciled in France. More specifically, the Court ruled against France against a Dutch national working in the Netherlands but domiciled in France to whom it applied social security contributions on life annuities concluded in the Netherlands.\r\nAccording to European case law, a taxpayer does not have to pay social contributions from several countries on this income. In other words, he is only accountable to one social security: concretely, a French cross-border worker working in Germany and whose income is already subject to social security contributions across the Rhine does not have to pay French social security contributions. A prohibition that has been valid for earned and replacement income (salaries, retirement pensions, allowances, etc.) since 2000 and which now officially applies to income from assets (property income, interest from a life insurance contract, etc.). ).\r\nREIMBURSEMENT AND PRESCRIPTION\r\nThe conflict settled by the CJEU dates back to the summer of 2012. The first finance law of Fran\u00e7ois Hollande's mandate introduced the application of social security contributions at 15.5% on the property income of non-residents as well as their capital gains real estate. The measure has since been strongly contested, in particular by wealth management professionals or even Fr\u00e9d\u00e9ric Lefebvre, UMP deputy for French expatriates in North America.\r\nAs a result of the judgment rendered by the Luxembourg court, taxpayers who have had to pay social security contributions since the entry into force of the measure can demand a refund. Please note, however, that a limitation period of two years applies to claims. It runs from the date of payment of social security contributions. In fact, some taxpayers can no longer obtain compensation: it was thus necessary to submit a request for reimbursement before 31 December 2014 for real estate capital gains realized in 2013. Conversely, social security contributions on property income collected in 2012 and taxed in 2013 can still be refunded. In this case, the request must be sent before December 31, 2015.\r\nOur firm assists you with complaints in order to guarantee your reimbursement.\r\nDAMY SELARL Law Firm with a capital of 949,000 euros 13 Boulevard Gambetta 06000 NICE Tel: 00334-92-15-05-05 Fax: 04-93-96-22-50 gregorydamy@niceavocats.fr","_et_gb_content_width":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[288,310],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2001","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-other","category-tax-law"],"yoast_head":"\nOpinion of the CJEU concerning the levy of the CSG and CRDS - Soci\u00e9t\u00e9 d'avocats Damy<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"EU Court Ruling The Court of Justice of the European Union has ruled against France concerning the levy of the CSG and the CRDS on\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/gregorydamy.niceavocats.fr\/en\/eu-court-ruling\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Opinion of the CJEU concerning the levy of the CSG and CRDS - Soci\u00e9t\u00e9 d'avocats Damy\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"EU Court Ruling The Court of Justice of the European Union has ruled against France concerning the levy of the CSG and the CRDS on\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/gregorydamy.niceavocats.fr\/en\/eu-court-ruling\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Soci\u00e9t\u00e9 d'avocats Damy\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/niceavocats.fr\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2015-04-13T16:52:51+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2023-08-02T06:10:26+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Kevin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Kevin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/gregorydamy.niceavocats.fr\/en\/eu-court-ruling\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/gregorydamy.niceavocats.fr\/en\/eu-court-ruling\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Kevin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/gregorydamy.niceavocats.fr\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/e040acb2856efaa1e114d0e7a92a3870\"},\"headline\":\"Opinion of the CJEU concerning the levy of the CSG and CRDS\",\"datePublished\":\"2015-04-13T16:52:51+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-08-02T06:10:26+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/gregorydamy.niceavocats.fr\/en\/eu-court-ruling\/\"},\"wordCount\":820,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/gregorydamy.niceavocats.fr\/en\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Other\",\"Tax law\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/gregorydamy.niceavocats.fr\/en\/eu-court-ruling\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/gregorydamy.niceavocats.fr\/en\/eu-court-ruling\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/gregorydamy.niceavocats.fr\/en\/eu-court-ruling\/\",\"name\":\"Opinion of the CJEU concerning the levy of the CSG and CRDS - Soci\u00e9t\u00e9 d'avocats Damy\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/gregorydamy.niceavocats.fr\/en\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2015-04-13T16:52:51+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-08-02T06:10:26+00:00\",\"description\":\"EU Court Ruling The Court of Justice of the European Union has ruled against France concerning the levy of the CSG and the CRDS on\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/gregorydamy.niceavocats.fr\/en\/eu-court-ruling\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/gregorydamy.niceavocats.fr\/en\/eu-court-ruling\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/gregorydamy.niceavocats.fr\/en\/eu-court-ruling\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Accueil\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/gregorydamy.niceavocats.fr\/en\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Opinion of the CJEU concerning the levy of the CSG and CRDS\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/gregorydamy.niceavocats.fr\/en\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/gregorydamy.niceavocats.fr\/en\/\",\"name\":\"Soci\u00e9t\u00e9 d'avocats Damy\",\"description\":\"Justice - Confiance - Efficacit\u00e9\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/gregorydamy.niceavocats.fr\/en\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/gregorydamy.niceavocats.fr\/en\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/gregorydamy.niceavocats.fr\/en\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Soci\u00e9t\u00e9 d'Avocats DAMY\",\"alternateName\":\"Gr\u00e9gory DAMY\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/gregorydamy.niceavocats.fr\/en\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/gregorydamy.niceavocats.fr\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/gregorydamy.niceavocats.fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/damylogo-1.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/gregorydamy.niceavocats.fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/damylogo-1.png\",\"width\":1890,\"height\":1417,\"caption\":\"Soci\u00e9t\u00e9 d'Avocats DAMY\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/gregorydamy.niceavocats.fr\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/niceavocats.fr\/\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/gregorydamy.niceavocats.fr\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/e040acb2856efaa1e114d0e7a92a3870\",\"name\":\"Kevin\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/gregorydamy.niceavocats.fr\/en\/author\/kevin\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Opinion of the CJEU concerning the levy of the CSG and CRDS - Soci\u00e9t\u00e9 d'avocats Damy","description":"EU Court Ruling The Court of Justice of the European Union has ruled against France concerning the levy of the CSG and the CRDS on","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/gregorydamy.niceavocats.fr\/en\/eu-court-ruling\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Opinion of the CJEU concerning the levy of the CSG and CRDS - Soci\u00e9t\u00e9 d'avocats Damy","og_description":"EU Court Ruling The Court of Justice of the European Union has ruled against France concerning the levy of the CSG and the CRDS on","og_url":"https:\/\/gregorydamy.niceavocats.fr\/en\/eu-court-ruling\/","og_site_name":"Soci\u00e9t\u00e9 d'avocats Damy","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/niceavocats.fr\/","article_published_time":"2015-04-13T16:52:51+00:00","article_modified_time":"2023-08-02T06:10:26+00:00","author":"Kevin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Kevin","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/gregorydamy.niceavocats.fr\/en\/eu-court-ruling\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/gregorydamy.niceavocats.fr\/en\/eu-court-ruling\/"},"author":{"name":"Kevin","@id":"https:\/\/gregorydamy.niceavocats.fr\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/e040acb2856efaa1e114d0e7a92a3870"},"headline":"Opinion of the CJEU concerning the levy of the CSG and CRDS","datePublished":"2015-04-13T16:52:51+00:00","dateModified":"2023-08-02T06:10:26+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/gregorydamy.niceavocats.fr\/en\/eu-court-ruling\/"},"wordCount":820,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/gregorydamy.niceavocats.fr\/en\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Other","Tax law"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/gregorydamy.niceavocats.fr\/en\/eu-court-ruling\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/gregorydamy.niceavocats.fr\/en\/eu-court-ruling\/","url":"https:\/\/gregorydamy.niceavocats.fr\/en\/eu-court-ruling\/","name":"Opinion of the CJEU concerning the levy of the CSG and CRDS - Soci\u00e9t\u00e9 d'avocats Damy","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/gregorydamy.niceavocats.fr\/en\/#website"},"datePublished":"2015-04-13T16:52:51+00:00","dateModified":"2023-08-02T06:10:26+00:00","description":"EU Court Ruling The Court of Justice of the European Union has ruled against France concerning the levy of the CSG and the CRDS on","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/gregorydamy.niceavocats.fr\/en\/eu-court-ruling\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/gregorydamy.niceavocats.fr\/en\/eu-court-ruling\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/gregorydamy.niceavocats.fr\/en\/eu-court-ruling\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Accueil","item":"https:\/\/gregorydamy.niceavocats.fr\/en\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Opinion of the CJEU concerning the levy of the CSG and CRDS"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/gregorydamy.niceavocats.fr\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/gregorydamy.niceavocats.fr\/en\/","name":"Soci\u00e9t\u00e9 d'avocats Damy","description":"Justice - Confiance - Efficacit\u00e9","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/gregorydamy.niceavocats.fr\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/gregorydamy.niceavocats.fr\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/gregorydamy.niceavocats.fr\/en\/#organization","name":"Soci\u00e9t\u00e9 d'Avocats DAMY","alternateName":"Gr\u00e9gory DAMY","url":"https:\/\/gregorydamy.niceavocats.fr\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/gregorydamy.niceavocats.fr\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/gregorydamy.niceavocats.fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/damylogo-1.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/gregorydamy.niceavocats.fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/damylogo-1.png","width":1890,"height":1417,"caption":"Soci\u00e9t\u00e9 d'Avocats DAMY"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/gregorydamy.niceavocats.fr\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/niceavocats.fr\/"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/gregorydamy.niceavocats.fr\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/e040acb2856efaa1e114d0e7a92a3870","name":"Kevin","url":"https:\/\/gregorydamy.niceavocats.fr\/en\/author\/kevin\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/gregorydamy.niceavocats.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2001","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/gregorydamy.niceavocats.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/gregorydamy.niceavocats.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gregorydamy.niceavocats.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gregorydamy.niceavocats.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2001"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/gregorydamy.niceavocats.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2001\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/gregorydamy.niceavocats.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2001"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gregorydamy.niceavocats.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2001"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gregorydamy.niceavocats.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2001"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}